A necessary
discussion of Section 213 and 218 of Penal Code, 1860
Shah Mohammad Omer Faruqe Jubaer
This article is exclusively discussing the criminal screening and incorrect framing of evidence under section 213 and 218 of the penal Code, 1860.
Discussion on section:
213
The title of
this section is “taking Gift, to screen an offender from punishment”
Legal Directions
from Section: If a person
accepting or attempting to obtain any gratification or restitution of property (an
offender condition of sentence, to repay money) for himself or any other
person.
Here the word
gratification must be obtained in consideration of:
·
Concealing/Hiding/covering an offense.
·
Screening from legal punishment for an offense.
·
Do not use any legal proceedings against the offender.
Here Screening
may involve procedural screening or case screening. So the Screening means,
the way of identification that could be won by the prosecution in courts.
This section
will apply when persons really guilty are screened. It is the legal duty of a state
to punish criminals in line with that no individual has the right to compound a
crime for their own interest.
Penal Directions: penal provisions of this section shall
apply in terms of grievousness and nature of crime so,
·
If it involves a capital offense, be punished for a term which may
extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine.
·
If it engrosses a punishment with imprisonment for life or a punishment
which may extend to 10 years, shall be punished with either description of
which may extend to three years and also liable to fine.
·
If the engaged punishment is not extending 10 years, shall be punished one-fourth
of the punishment with the longest term of imprisonment.
General
Discussion: It should be noted
that, if a person is charged with a
criminal offense has a right to disclosure. Disclosure is the information
in the police that may be relied upon in any way to further their prosecution.
But, a person charged has the same right to evidence as the person
prosecuting it. There are some very limited exceptions to what a person
is entitled to in disclosure. Those limits are usually as a result of
privilege, complete irrelevancy, or if the material is not in the possession of
police for prosecuting the matter. So, screening is not involving any kind of
grounds because the person screened or attempted to screen from legal
punishment has been guilty of an offense under penal code 1860.
Discussion on Section: 218
The title of
this section involves “public servants who framing incorrect frames with the intention to save a person from punishment under penal code 1860.
Legal
Directions of section 218: it deals with the intentional preparation of a false record with the
object of saving any person from punishment or injuring property.
The correctness
of records is the highest importance and safety issue to the state as well as
for the public. According to the evidence law, public records are public
evidence. So, the intention with which the public servant does the act
mentioned in the title of this section is an essential ingredient of the
offense punishable under section 218 of penal code 1860.
Ingredients of an offense under section 218:
The section
218 has a few essential ingredients
·
The offender must be a public servant.
·
The public servant must prepare public record and writings.
·
The offender must have a clear intention and knowledge to frame that record
or writings incorrectly.
·
The public record or writing must cause loss and injuries.
·
The record or writing may save some person from legal proceedings.
·
The record must immune any person from forfeiture or legal liability.
Example: Manipulation of records by the police
officer in terms of police diary or other criminal investigation.
Penal
Descriptions: the penal
provision of this section incorporated with the punishment of either
description for a term which may extend three years, or with fine or with both.
Charge: Charge under section 218 of the penal code
1860 is exclusively trial by the sessions Court. But if the trial was without
jurisdiction, as soon as the magistrate had framed a charge under section 218 he
lost jurisdiction over the trial.
Comments
Post a Comment
Please do not enter any spam link in comment box